Motorola Solutions, Inc. MSI (last ticker on record)
CIK 68505Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jul 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked May 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jan 1999 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Aug 1998 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- JACKSON TUFTS COLE & BLACK, LLPFirst linked Aug 1998 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
- Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 150 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | May 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Winston & Strawn | Jan 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jan 1999 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| DLA Piper | Aug 1998 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| JACKSON TUFTS COLE & BLACK, LLP | Aug 1998 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 1.69 |
| Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 150 | 1.08 | 0.42 | 1.31 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Charles T. HaagWinston & StrawnFirst linked Feb 2024 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- David C. KarpWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Christopher M. BartoliBaker & McKenzieFirst linked May 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Craig A. RoederBaker & McKenzieFirst linked May 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- Patricia A. VlahakisWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Clare O'BrienShearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.33×
- John L. MacCarthyWinston & StrawnFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles T. HaagWinston & Strawn | Feb 2024 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 1.62 |
| David C. KarpWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2015 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| Christopher M. BartoliBaker & McKenzie | May 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Craig A. RoederBaker & McKenzie | May 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 1.72 |
| Patricia A. VlahakisWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Clare O'BrienShearman & Sterling | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 23 | 1.77 | 0.00 | 0.33 |
| John L. MacCarthyWinston & Strawn | May 2001 | Text search only | 5 | 3.61 | 0.00 | 1.79 |