RUBY TUESDAY INC RT (last ticker on record)
CIK 68270Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Sep 2007 to Mar 2009
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in a filing · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Saul EwingFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in a filing · 100 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Stinson Morrison HeckerFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in a filing · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked May 2009 · Named in a filing · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2009 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Powell GoldsteinFirst linked Jan 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunton & Williams | Feb 2013 | Named in a filing | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Saul Ewing | Feb 2013 | Named in a filing | 100 | 1.22 | 1.01 | 1.14 |
| Stinson Morrison Hecker | Feb 2013 | Named in a filing | 93 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Bryan Cave | May 2009 | Named in a filing | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Davis Polk | May 2009 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Powell Goldstein | Jan 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 196 | 0.71 | 0.48 | 0.65 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard A. DruckerDavis PolkFirst linked May 2009 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.89× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- M. Todd WadePowell GoldsteinFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 1.42× · 95% wipeout 2.43×
- Gabriel DumitrescuPowell GoldsteinFirst linked Jan 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard A. DruckerDavis Polk | May 2009 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.16 | 0.89 | 0.53 |
| M. Todd WadePowell Goldstein | Jan 2005 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.13 | 1.42 | 2.43 |
| Gabriel DumitrescuPowell Goldstein | Jan 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.94 |