APACHE CORP APA (last ticker on record)
CIK 6769Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- May 2008 to Mar 2020
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked May 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Bennett JonesFirst linked May 2003 · Named in a filing · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Chamberlain Hrdlicka White Williams & MartinFirst linked May 2003 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked May 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- McInnes CooperFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- WILLIAMS & MARTINFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 1.76×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Aug 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Mayor, Day, Caldwell & Keeton, L.L.P.First linked Jan 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | May 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 161 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Bracewell LLP | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 1.03 |
| Bennett Jones | May 2003 | Named in a filing | 121 | 1.27 | 0.16 | 1.29 |
| Chamberlain Hrdlicka White Williams & Martin | May 2003 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.91 | 1.24 | 1.48 |
| Sidley Austin | May 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| McInnes Cooper | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 34 | 1.14 | 0.48 | 1.14 |
| Brown & Wood | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| WILLIAMS & MARTIN | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.14 | 0.94 | 1.76 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Aug 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Mayor, Day, Caldwell & Keeton, L.L.P. | Jan 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | May 2010 | Text search only | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.89 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John B. ClutterbuckMayor, Day, Caldwell & Keeton, L.L.P.First linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.42×
- James M. PrinceVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- William N. Finnegan IVLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- GEOFFREY K. WALKERAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Jan 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.47×
- Jon W. DalyAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Kenneth E. MooreReitner, Stuart & MooreFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John B. ClutterbuckMayor, Day, Caldwell & Keeton, L.L.P. | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 2.42 |
| James M. PrinceVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.61 |
| William N. Finnegan IVLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| GEOFFREY K. WALKERAndrews Kurth LLP | Jan 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 2.47 |
| Jon W. DalyAndrews Kurth LLP | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Kenneth E. MooreReitner, Stuart & Moore | May 2010 | Text search only | 20 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.55 |