PHARMACIA CORP
CIK 67686Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 1998 · Named in a filing · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jun 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Lewis | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.01 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Oct 1998 | Named in a filing | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Winston & Strawn | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.01 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jun 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert J. LichtensteinMorgan LewisFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
- Matthew G. HurdSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- ERIC S. ROBINSONWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- RICHARD D. KATCHERWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert J. LichtensteinMorgan Lewis | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.42 |
| Matthew G. HurdSullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2000 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| ERIC S. ROBINSONWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 34 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| RICHARD D. KATCHERWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.00 |