MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP INC MUFG (last ticker on record)
CIK 67088Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Nagashima Ohno & TsunematsuFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- MORI HAMADA & MATSUMOTOFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Oct 2008 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu | Nov 2008 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Maples and Calder | Feb 2006 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| MORI HAMADA & MATSUMOTO | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.81 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Oct 2008 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Tong YuPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Donald J. ToumeySullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2008 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Mark S. BergmanPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tong YuPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Donald J. ToumeySullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2008 | Text search only | 10 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Mark S. BergmanPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 20 | 0.61 | 1.06 | 0.86 |