MINES MANAGEMENT INC MGN (last ticker on record)
CIK 66649Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- May 2006 to Dec 2015
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- HAWLEY TROXELL ENNIS & HAWLEYFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Davis Graham & StubbsFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 142 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- PAINE HAMBLENFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.27×
- Workland & WitherspoonFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 4.27× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAWLEY TROXELL ENNIS & HAWLEY | Apr 2011 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.86 | 1.33 | 1.53 |
| Davis Graham & Stubbs | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 142 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.46 |
| PAINE HAMBLEN | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 3.27 |
| Workland & Witherspoon | Apr 2003 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 4.27 | 1.10 |
| Feldman Weinstein | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- PATRICIA PETERSONDavis Graham & StubbsFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.01×
- Deborah J. FriedmanDavis Graham & StubbsFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 2.42× · 95% wipeout 1.95×
- Lawrence R. SmallPAINE HAMBLENFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.71×
- Gregory B. LipskerWorkland & WitherspoonFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.62× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PATRICIA PETERSONDavis Graham & Stubbs | Dec 2007 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.01 |
| Deborah J. FriedmanDavis Graham & Stubbs | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.82 | 2.42 | 1.95 |
| Lawrence R. SmallPAINE HAMBLEN | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.71 |
| Gregory B. LipskerWorkland & Witherspoon | Apr 2003 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 3.62 | 1.05 |