ALLTEL CORP AT (last ticker on record)
CIK 65873Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Friedman Kaplan Seiler & AdelmanFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Kutak RockFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 123 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 1.56× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Friday Eldredge & ClarkFirst linked Dec 1998 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Rose Law FirmFirst linked Jun 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.33×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Thompson Hine LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Jones DayFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Lane Powell PCFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.68 | 0.98 | 1.53 |
| Kutak Rock | Jan 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 123 | 0.93 | 1.56 | 0.64 |
| Foley & Lardner | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Friday Eldredge & Clark | Dec 1998 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.20 | 0.79 | 1.21 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Rose Law Firm | Jun 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 2.33 |
| Davis Polk | May 2006 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Thompson Hine LLP | May 2006 | Text search only | 208 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 1.09 |
| Jones Day | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Lane Powell PC | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 36 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul J. ShimCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- John P. FletcherKutak RockFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Benjamin F. Garmer IIIFoley & LardnerFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Barry A. AdelmanFriedman Kaplan Seiler & AdelmanFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul J. ShimCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 45 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| John P. FletcherKutak Rock | Mar 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Benjamin F. Garmer IIIFoley & Lardner | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 31 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Barry A. AdelmanFriedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 75 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.82 |