ANGELICA CORP AGL (last ticker on record)
CIK 6571Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stinson Morrison HeckerFirst linked Jun 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jun 2008 · Named in a filing · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Thompson CoburnFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Thompson & MitchellFirst linked Jun 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stinson Morrison Hecker | Jun 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 93 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| White & Case | Jun 2008 | Named in a filing | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
| Thompson Coburn | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 85 | 1.13 | 1.01 | 1.33 |
| Thompson & Mitchell | Jun 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 2.59 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William F. Wynne Jr.White & CaseFirst linked Jun 2008 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John A. GrandaStinson Morrison HeckerFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
- Steve WoloskyOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- ROBERT M. LAROSEThompson CoburnFirst linked Jun 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William F. Wynne Jr.White & Case | Jun 2008 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John A. GrandaStinson Morrison Hecker | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 0.46 |
| Steve WoloskyOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Apr 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 95 | 1.71 | 0.37 | 0.90 |
| ROBERT M. LAROSEThompson Coburn | Jun 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.79 | 0.00 | 0.74 |