METROPOLITAN EDISON CO ME (last ticker on record)
CIK 65350Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akin GumpFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in a filing · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Berlack, Israels & Liberman LLPFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.88× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked May 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akin Gump | Sep 2004 | Named in a filing | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Berlack, Israels & Liberman LLP | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.88 | 0.48 | 0.44 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | May 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wendy E. StarkFirst linked Jan 2009 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gary D. BenzFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Lucas F. TorresAkin GumpFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy E. Stark | Jan 2009 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.88 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gary D. Benz | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Lucas F. TorresAkin Gump | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 |