MOSCOW CABLECOM CORP MOCC (last ticker on record)
CIK 6383Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked May 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Robinson & Cole LLPFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 133 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Reed SmithFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | May 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Robinson & Cole LLP | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 133 | 0.95 | 0.56 | 0.88 |
| Reed Smith | May 2007 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Henry LesserDLA PiperFirst linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Scott F. SmithCovington & BurlingFirst linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.36×
- Thomas A. KleeCranmore, FitzGerald & MeaneyFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David A. GarbusRobinson & Cole LLPFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 3.41× · 95% wipeout 5.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henry LesserDLA Piper | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Scott F. SmithCovington & Burling | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 0.36 |
| Thomas A. KleeCranmore, FitzGerald & Meaney | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David A. GarbusRobinson & Cole LLP | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.94 | 3.41 | 5.38 |