MAYTAG CORP MYG (last ticker on record)
CIK 63541Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faegre & Benson | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Sidley Austin | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Winston & Strawn | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Brown & Wood | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- KRIS SHARPEFaegre & BensonFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Wendy B. MahlingFaegre & BensonFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- William J. Quinlan Jr.McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.99×
- Dennis V. OsimitzSidley AustinFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRIS SHARPEFaegre & Benson | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Wendy B. MahlingFaegre & Benson | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| William J. Quinlan Jr.McDermott Will & Emery | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 6 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 2.99 |
| Dennis V. OsimitzSidley Austin | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 1.59 |