MATTEL INC MAT (last ticker on record)
CIK 63276Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Riordan & McKinzieFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 1.13× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Baer Marks & UphamFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Irell & ManellaFirst linked Aug 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jun 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Riordan & McKinzie | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 39 | 1.74 | 1.13 | 1.22 |
| Baer Marks & Upham | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.89 | 1.31 | 1.23 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Irell & Manella | Aug 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 1.73 | 1.09 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sean FellerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in a filing · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Brian LaneGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Regina M. SchlatterLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Alison S. ResslerSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Patrick S. BrownSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- James P. BeaubienLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- THOMAS C. SADLERLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 1999 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- CYNTHIA M. DUNNETTRiordan & McKinzieFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 2.13× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- THOMAS M. CLEARYRiordan & McKinzieFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- JOEL M. HANDELBaer Marks & UphamFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.83×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sean FellerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in a filing | 43 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Brian LaneGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jun 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Regina M. SchlatterLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2010 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.57 | 1.12 | 0.64 |
| Alison S. ResslerSullivan & Cromwell | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Patrick S. BrownSullivan & Cromwell | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 37 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| James P. BeaubienLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 13 | 2.65 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| THOMAS C. SADLERLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 1999 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| CYNTHIA M. DUNNETTRiordan & McKinzie | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.27 | 2.13 | 0.54 |
| THOMAS M. CLEARYRiordan & McKinzie | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 6 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| JOEL M. HANDELBaer Marks & Upham | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 1.83 |