ANACOMP INC ANCPA (last ticker on record)
CIK 6260Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Leagre Chandler & Millard LLPFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Jan 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Leagre Chandler & Millard LLP | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Jan 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | May 2002 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Douglas J. ReinDLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Marty B. LorenzoDLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- MICHAEL C. RYANCadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Jan 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Douglas J. ReinDLA Piper | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.08 | 0.49 | 0.90 |
| Marty B. LorenzoDLA Piper | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| MICHAEL C. RYANCadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Jan 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.13 |