MANITOWOC CO INC MTW (last ticker on record)
CIK 61986Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Dec 2007 to Mar 2009
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Quarles & BradyFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quarles & Brady | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 170 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.79 |
| Foley & Lardner | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Russell E. RybaFoley & LardnerFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Patrick G. QuickFoley & LardnerFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Mark T. PlichtaFoley & LardnerFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- Jay O. RothmanFoley & LardnerFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Russell E. RybaFoley & Lardner | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| Patrick G. QuickFoley & Lardner | Mar 2017 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Mark T. PlichtaFoley & Lardner | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.59 | 0.00 | 0.47 |
| Jay O. RothmanFoley & Lardner | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & Reindel | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 40 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 1.15 |