LYDALL INC LDL (last ticker on record)
CIK 60977Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2012 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Murtha CullinaFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.89× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Mar 2015 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Davis Polk | May 2012 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Murtha Cullina | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 36 | 1.26 | 0.89 | 1.26 |
| HALE AND DORR | Mar 2015 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jonathan WolfmanWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Richard S. Smith Jr.Murtha CullinaFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan WolfmanWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Richard S. Smith Jr.Murtha Cullina | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.00 |