LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORP LPX (last ticker on record)
CIK 60519Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Jan 2006 to Mar 2009
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jones DayFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Miller Nash LLPFirst linked Aug 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2012 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jones Day | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Miller Nash LLP | Aug 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2012 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael J. Solecki Jones DayCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Michael J. SoleckiCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.84×
- Mary Ann FrantzMiller Nash LLPFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Paul T. ShultzFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 136 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Mark E. BetzenJones DayFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael J. Solecki Jones DayCravath Swaine & Moore | Oct 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Michael J. SoleckiCravath Swaine & Moore | Oct 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 48 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 1.84 |
| Mary Ann FrantzMiller Nash LLP | Oct 2007 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Paul T. Shultz | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 136 | 1.34 | 0.18 | 1.49 |
| Mark E. BetzenJones Day | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.68 |