LONGVIEW FIBRE CO LFB (last ticker on record)
CIK 60302Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Perkins Coie | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- M. Christopher HallPerkins CoieFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Danielle BenderlyPerkins CoieFirst linked Sep 2002 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Chris HallPerkins CoieFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.36×
- Roy W. TuckerPerkins CoieFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Christopher HallPerkins Coie | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 1.08 |
| Danielle BenderlyPerkins Coie | Sep 2002 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.65 | 1.26 | 0.91 |
| Chris HallPerkins Coie | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.36 |
| Roy W. TuckerPerkins Coie | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |