AT&T CORP T (last ticker on record)
CIK 5907Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- WolfBlock LLPFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 84 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 1.36× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Feb 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WolfBlock LLP | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 84 | 0.84 | 1.36 | 1.04 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Feb 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Davis Polk | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DAVID M. SILKWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Charles S. Whitman IIISullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jan 1999 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Steven A. RosenblumWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
- RICHARD D. KATCHERWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Feb 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Jean M. McLoughlinDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAVID M. SILKWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Charles S. Whitman IIISullivan & Cromwell | Jan 1999 | Named in a filing | 9 | 3.92 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Steven A. RosenblumWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 55 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| RICHARD D. KATCHERWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Feb 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 160 | 1.27 | 0.15 | 0.90 |
| Jean M. McLoughlinDavis Polk | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 24 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.41 |