LEE ENTERPRISES, Inc LEE (last ticker on record)
CIK 58361Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Sep 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jun 2004 to Mar 2009
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Nelson MullinsFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in a filing · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Drinker Biddle & ReathFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 213 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Potter Anderson & CorroonFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Jan 2020 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Nelson Mullins | Feb 2020 | Named in a filing | 301 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.88 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Drinker Biddle & Reath | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 213 | 1.46 | 0.77 | 1.25 |
| Arnold & Porter | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.84 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.89 |
| Potter Anderson & Corroon | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 127 | 1.41 | 0.45 | 0.87 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Jan 2020 | Text search only | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jennifer LeeKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2026 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Shaun J. MathewKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer LeeKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2026 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Shaun J. MathewKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 10 | 1.96 | 0.00 | 0.61 |