KROGER CO KR (last ticker on record)
CIK 56873Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Dec 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Aug 2024 · Named in a filing · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in a filing · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Jan 2012 · Named in a filing · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Aug 2024 | Named in a filing | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | Oct 2014 | Named in a filing | 127 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| Fried Frank | Jan 2012 | Named in a filing | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Aug 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew E. ZuckermanReid and RiegeFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in a filing · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Paul T. ShultzFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in a filing · 136 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Jeffrey BagnerFried FrankFirst linked Nov 1998 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Robert W. Reeder IIISullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew E. ZuckermanReid and Riege | Jul 2014 | Named in a filing | 72 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Paul T. Shultz | Mar 2008 | Named in a filing | 136 | 1.34 | 0.18 | 1.49 |
| Jeffrey BagnerFried Frank | Nov 1998 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Robert W. Reeder IIISullivan & Cromwell | Aug 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 3.70 |