NORTH AMERICAN GALVANIZING & COATINGS INC NGA (last ticker on record)
CIK 55805Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Chadbourne & ParkeFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C.First linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Aug 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Nelson MullinsFirst linked Sep 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chadbourne & Parke | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 110 | 1.64 | 0.62 | 0.87 |
| Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C. | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 1.07 |
| King & Spalding | Aug 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Nelson Mullins | Sep 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 301 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.88 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edward P. SmithChadbourne & ParkeFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- Paul A. QuirosKing & SpaldingFirst linked Sep 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edward P. SmithChadbourne & Parke | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 6 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 1.72 |
| Paul A. QuirosKing & Spalding | Sep 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.07 |