KIMBERLY CLARK CORP KMB (last ticker on record)
CIK 55785Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Nov 2026 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in a filing · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Locke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Aug 1999 · Named in a filing · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Feb 1998 · Named in a filing · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Nov 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jun 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Apr 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Dec 2025 · Text search only · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Nov 2026 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Dec 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jun 2016 | Named in a filing | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Aug 1999 | Named in a filing | 106 | 1.24 | 0.72 | 1.73 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Feb 1998 | Named in a filing | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Sidley Austin | Nov 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jun 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Ballard Spahr | Apr 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Arnold & Porter | Dec 2025 | Text search only | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edward J. LeeWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Rachel W. SheridanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Andrew L. FabensGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in a filing · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- John W. CarrShapiro Buchman ProvineFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Vincent Pagano Jr.Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Gina E. BettsLocke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Aug 1999 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Allan G. SperlingCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Feb 1998 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Dennis V. OsimitzSidley AustinFirst linked Nov 1997 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Robert E. BuckholzSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jun 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edward J. LeeWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.81 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Rachel W. SheridanLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.47 |
| Andrew L. FabensGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jun 2016 | Named in a filing | 85 | 1.47 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| John W. CarrShapiro Buchman Provine | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| Vincent Pagano Jr.Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 36 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Gina E. BettsLocke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Aug 1999 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Allan G. SperlingCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Feb 1998 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Dennis V. OsimitzSidley Austin | Nov 1997 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 1.59 |
| Robert E. BuckholzSullivan & Cromwell | Jun 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 0.93 |