KII Liquidating Inc. KATY (last ticker on record)
CIK 54681Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began May 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in a filing · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Schiff HardinFirst linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Jun 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ropes & Gray | Oct 2008 | Named in a filing | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| Schiff Hardin | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 184 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 1.26 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Jun 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Sep 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel S. EvansRopes & GrayFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David M. CarterHunton & WilliamsFirst linked May 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel S. EvansRopes & Gray | Oct 2008 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David M. CarterHunton & Williams | May 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.37 |