KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN KSU (last ticker on record)
CIK 54480Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Husch BlackwellFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in a filing · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- White & CaseFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 169 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2021 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Husch Blackwell | Feb 2012 | Named in a filing | 154 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 1.18 |
| White & Case | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Jan 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
| Patton Boggs | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.89 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 169 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven A. RosenblumWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
- Colin J. DiamondWhite & CaseFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in a filing · 83 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Andrew WeisbergWhite & CaseFirst linked May 2016 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gary KasharWhite & CaseFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Marc SalleSonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kevin R. SweeneyShook Hardy & BaconFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John F MarvinSonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven A. RosenblumWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2021 | Named in a filing | 55 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| Colin J. DiamondWhite & Case | Nov 2017 | Named in a filing | 83 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Andrew WeisbergWhite & Case | May 2016 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gary KasharWhite & Case | Apr 2014 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| Marc SalleSonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Nov 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kevin R. SweeneyShook Hardy & Bacon | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John F MarvinSonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Nov 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.59 |