FORT JAMES CORP FJ (last ticker on record)
CIK 53117Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in a filing · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked May 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King & Spalding | Apr 2003 | Named in a filing | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.01 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | May 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- WILLIAM R. SPALDINGKing & SpaldingFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Danielle CarboneShearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 2.72×
- Patricia A. VlahakisWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- MARY A. BERNARDKing & SpaldingFirst linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.97×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WILLIAM R. SPALDINGKing & Spalding | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Danielle CarboneShearman & Sterling | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.82 | 0.99 | 2.72 |
| Patricia A. VlahakisWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| MARY A. BERNARDKing & Spalding | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 14 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 1.97 |