IRWIN FINANCIAL CORP IFC (last ticker on record)
CIK 52617Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Sep 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in a filing · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Vedder PriceFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Ice MillerFirst linked Sep 1995 · Named in a filing · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Barnes & ThornburgFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 167 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Miller Nash LLPFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDermott Will & Emery | Jun 2009 | Named in a filing | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Oct 2008 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Vedder Price | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 144 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.94 |
| Ice Miller | Sep 1995 | Named in a filing | 112 | 1.19 | 0.21 | 0.93 |
| Barnes & Thornburg | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 167 | 1.07 | 0.70 | 0.86 |
| Fried Frank | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Miller Nash LLP | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 41 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jay ClaytonSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Dennis J. BlockCadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Jennifer Durham KingVedder PriceFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- JENNIFER R. EVANSVedder PriceFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- Stephen J. HackmanIce MillerFirst linked Sep 1995 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jay ClaytonSullivan & Cromwell | Oct 2008 | Named in a filing | 13 | 2.43 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Dennis J. BlockCadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 1.46 | 0.73 | 1.23 |
| Jennifer Durham KingVedder Price | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| JENNIFER R. EVANSVedder Price | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| Stephen J. HackmanIce Miller | Sep 1995 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 0.54 |