INNOVEX INC INVX (last ticker on record)
CIK 50601Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Lindquist & VennumFirst linked May 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 101 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Lindquist & Vennum | May 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 101 | 0.97 | 0.44 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jonathan B. LevyLindquist & VennumFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Louis A. GoodmanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Margaret A. BrownSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Thomas G. Lovett IVLindquist & VennumFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- Charles P. MoorseLindquist & VennumFirst linked May 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.69× · 95% wipeout 3.48×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan B. LevyLindquist & Vennum | Jan 2005 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Louis A. GoodmanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Margaret A. BrownSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.37 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Thomas G. Lovett IVLindquist & Vennum | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.72 |
| Charles P. MoorseLindquist & Vennum | May 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 3.69 | 3.48 |