ISPAT INLAND INC
CIK 50548Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- for De Brauw Blackstone WestbroekFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Ogilvy RenaultFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayer Brown | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Baker & Daniels | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| for De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 7 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Ogilvy Renault | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 53 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Philip J. NiehoffMayer BrownFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- Richard E. FarleyCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philip J. NiehoffMayer Brown | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 38 | 1.68 | 0.66 | 0.57 |
| Richard E. FarleyCahill Gordon & Reindel | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 11 | 3.12 | 0.00 | 0.90 |