SAUCONY INC SCNYA (last ticker on record)
CIK 49401Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Barnes & ThornburgFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 167 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Gibson Dunn & CrutcherFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 1,126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Seyfarth ShawFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| HALE AND DORR | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| Barnes & Thornburg | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 167 | 1.07 | 0.70 | 0.86 |
| Gibson Dunn & Crutcher | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 1,126 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.95 |
| Seyfarth Shaw | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 102 | 1.57 | 1.38 | 1.23 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robyn E. ZolmanGibson Dunn & CrutcherFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Stephen I. GloverGibson Dunn & CrutcherFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Hal J. LeibowitzWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robyn E. ZolmanGibson Dunn & Crutcher | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 28 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Stephen I. GloverGibson Dunn & Crutcher | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 31 | 1.56 | 1.39 | 0.85 |
| Hal J. LeibowitzWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 39 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.77 |