HUGHES SUPPLY INC HUG (last ticker on record)
CIK 49029Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Powell GoldsteinFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 1,224 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.89 |
| Holland & Knight | Oct 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 413 | 1.16 | 0.82 | 1.21 |
| Powell Goldstein | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 196 | 0.71 | 0.48 | 0.79 |
| Greenberg Traurig | May 2005 | Text search only | 1,224 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
| Perkins Coie | May 2005 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2005 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Marita A. MakinenFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Thomas A. RobertsWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Tom McAleaveyHolland & KnightFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.86×
- G. William SpeerPowell GoldsteinFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marita A. Makinen | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Thomas A. RobertsWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Tom McAleaveyHolland & Knight | Oct 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.86 |
| G. William SpeerPowell Goldstein | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 1.82 |