CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC LLC
CIK 48732Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Feb 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Feb 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jason A. RochaBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- Timothy S. TaylorBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Sep 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- MARGO S. SCHOLINBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Steven R. LoeshelleDewey BallantineFirst linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Stephen A. MassadBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Christopher J. ArntzenAkin GumpFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason A. RochaBaker Botts L.L.P. | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.32 |
| Timothy S. TaylorBaker Botts L.L.P. | Sep 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| MARGO S. SCHOLINBaker Botts L.L.P. | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Steven R. LoeshelleDewey Ballantine | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Stephen A. MassadBaker Botts L.L.P. | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Christopher J. ArntzenAkin Gump | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 6 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.00 |