STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS
CIK 48595Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Venable LLPFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Mar 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Mar 1996 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Lionel Sawyer & CollinsFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 128 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venable LLP | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Ballard Spahr | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Mar 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.89 |
| Sidley Austin | Mar 1996 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Lionel Sawyer & Collins | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 128 | 1.07 | 0.88 | 0.96 |
| Brown & Wood | May 2002 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | May 2002 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael A. GordonSidley AustinFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- ROBERT W. KADLECSidley AustinFirst linked Feb 1999 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 6.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Paul M. HarringtonFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.87×
- Raymond Y. LinLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael A. GordonSidley Austin | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 19 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| ROBERT W. KADLECSidley Austin | Feb 1999 | Named in a filing | 5 | 6.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Paul M. Harrington | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 1.87 |
| Raymond Y. LinLatham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 37 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 2.32 |