HERTZ CORP
CIK 47129Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began May 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 16
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in a filing · 223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Jones WalkerFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in a filing · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Jenner & BlockFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 122 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Jun 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- HARTZOG CONGER & CASONFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Schiff HardinFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNELFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP | Jan 2013 | Named in a filing | 223 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.97 |
| Jones Walker | Jan 2013 | Named in a filing | 161 | 1.34 | 0.23 | 0.94 |
| Jenner & Block | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 122 | 1.12 | 0.78 | 0.94 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| Sidley Austin | Oct 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Brown & Wood | Jun 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| HARTZOG CONGER & CASON | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 11 | 2.42 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Schiff Hardin | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 184 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 1.26 |
| MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNEL | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 17 | 3.17 | 0.00 | 0.48 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.89 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey R. ShumanJenner & BlockFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.66×
- Donald E. BattersonJenner & BlockFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.76×
- Thomas A. MonsonJenner & BlockFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.57×
- Steven J. SlutzkyDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Alan D. SchnitzerSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Lisa L. JacobsShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- ANDREW R. BROWNSTEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- George R. Bason Jr.Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- David J. SorkinSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- William L. Tolbert Jr.Jenner & BlockFirst linked Oct 2013 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- William J. MillerCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Kirk A. DavenportLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey R. ShumanJenner & Block | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 2.66 |
| Donald E. BattersonJenner & Block | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 2.76 |
| Thomas A. MonsonJenner & Block | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 1.57 |
| Steven J. SlutzkyDebevoise & Plimpton | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 50 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| Alan D. SchnitzerSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 8 | 3.48 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Lisa L. JacobsShearman & Sterling | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| ANDREW R. BROWNSTEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 117 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| George R. Bason Jr.Davis Polk | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.58 |
| David J. SorkinSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| William L. Tolbert Jr.Jenner & Block | Oct 2013 | Text search only | 15 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 1.36 |
| William J. MillerCahill Gordon & Reindel | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 20 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Kirk A. DavenportLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 52 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.80 |