HARTE HANKS INC HHS (last ticker on record)
CIK 45919Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jun 2005 to Apr 2020
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in a filing · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Sep 2018 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jul 2013 · Named in a filing · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Mesirov Gelman Jaffe Cramer & Jamieson, LLPFirst linked Mar 1996 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
- Hughes & LuceFirst linked Jun 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 2.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Aug 2020 | Named in a filing | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Morgan Lewis | Sep 2018 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jul 2013 | Named in a filing | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Mesirov Gelman Jaffe Cramer & Jamieson, LLP | Mar 1996 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.69 |
| Hughes & Luce | Jun 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 1.25 | 0.58 | 2.09 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brett NadritchMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Richard B. AldridgeMorgan LewisFirst linked Sep 2018 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.36×
- Alan J. BogdanowVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Mar 1996 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brett NadritchMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Aug 2020 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Richard B. AldridgeMorgan Lewis | Sep 2018 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.36 |
| Alan J. BogdanowVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Mar 1996 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 1.07 |