AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
CIK 4515Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-K405 (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Shipman & GoodwinFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Morris JamesFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Bingham DanaFirst linked Jun 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- RAY, QUINNEY & NEBEKERFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2014 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Shipman & Goodwin | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.25 | 0.82 | 1.18 |
| Morris James | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 95 | 1.62 | 0.42 | 0.86 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Bingham Dana | Jun 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 104 | 1.37 | 0.54 | 1.14 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| RAY, QUINNEY & NEBEKER | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 22 | 2.04 | 1.33 | 1.74 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul M. RodelDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Peter J. LoughranDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in a filing · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Rohan S. WeerasingheShearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- John F. KennedyFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul M. RodelDebevoise & Plimpton | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.35 | 0.00 | 1.08 |
| Peter J. LoughranDebevoise & Plimpton | Nov 2009 | Named in a filing | 40 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| Rohan S. WeerasingheShearman & Sterling | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.75 |
| John F. Kennedy | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 190 | 1.52 | 0.60 | 1.17 |