U-Haul Holding Co UHALB (last ticker on record)
CIK 4457Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2003
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Lionel Sawyer & CollinsFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 128 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- RYAN SWANSON & CLEVELANDFirst linked Feb 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Nov 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Lionel Sawyer & Collins | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 128 | 1.07 | 0.88 | 0.96 |
| RYAN SWANSON & CLEVELAND | Feb 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| Snell & Wilmer | Nov 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gregory R. HallDLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 2.02×
- Michael M. DonaheySnell & WilmerFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.40×
- Debra K. WeinerWickersham & MurphyFirst linked Dec 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 0.89× · 95% wipeout 3.97×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gregory R. HallDLA Piper | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.04 | 0.91 | 2.02 |
| Michael M. DonaheySnell & Wilmer | Mar 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 2.40 |
| Debra K. WeinerWickersham & Murphy | Dec 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.54 | 0.89 | 3.97 |