GRAY MEDIA, INC GTN (last ticker on record)
CIK 43196Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Feb 2005 to Nov 2008
- Law firms
- 14
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSONFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Woodburn and WedgeFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- McAlister & HilbertFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Jones DayFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- SHACK & SIEGEL, P.C.First linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Shack Siegel Katz Flaherty & GoodmanFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Sher Garner Cahill Richter Klein McAlister & HilbertFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON | Apr 2021 | Named in a filing | 58 | 1.13 | 0.57 | 1.27 |
| Woodburn and Wedge | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 62 | 1.51 | 1.15 | 1.12 |
| McAlister & Hilbert | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 1.62 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| Proskauer Rose | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Jones Day | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Sidley Austin | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Alston & Bird | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Covington & Burling | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| SHACK & SIEGEL, P.C. | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Shack Siegel Katz Flaherty & Goodman | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Sher Garner Cahill Richter Klein McAlister & Hilbert | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 6 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 1.62 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shawn G. PearsonWoodburn and WedgeFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Mark L. HansonJones DayFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Robert A. CantoneProskauer RoseFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Henry O. Smith IIIProskauer RoseFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 3.48× · 95% wipeout 3.01×
- Arnold S. JacobsProskauer RoseFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 2.39× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shawn G. PearsonWoodburn and Wedge | Aug 2013 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Mark L. HansonJones Day | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| Robert A. CantoneProskauer Rose | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Henry O. Smith IIIProskauer Rose | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.06 | 3.48 | 3.01 |
| Arnold S. JacobsProskauer Rose | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 24 | 1.29 | 2.39 | 1.12 |