SENTO CORP SNTO (last ticker on record)
CIK 4317Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 2004 to Dec 2008
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stoel RivesFirst linked Sep 2002 · Named in a filing · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Parr Brown Gee & LovelessFirst linked Aug 1999 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 2.78× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- KIMBALL, PARR, WADDOUPS, BROWN & GEEFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 1.83× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Kruse Landa & MaycockFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 1.78× · 95% wipeout 2.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stoel Rives | Sep 2002 | Named in a filing | 208 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.20 |
| Parr Brown Gee & Loveless | Aug 1999 | Named in a filing | 33 | 2.04 | 2.78 | 1.21 |
| KIMBALL, PARR, WADDOUPS, BROWN & GEE | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.69 | 1.83 | 0.84 |
| Kruse Landa & Maycock | May 2004 | Text search only | 23 | 1.69 | 1.78 | 2.01 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bryan T. AllenParr Brown Gee & LovelessFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 2.93× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Brian G. LloydParr Brown Gee & LovelessFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.46× · Went dark 4.86× · 95% wipeout 3.05×
- RICHARD G. BROWNKIMBALL, PARR, WADDOUPS, BROWN & GEEFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 5.34× · 95% wipeout 1.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryan T. AllenParr Brown Gee & Loveless | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.78 | 2.93 | 1.17 |
| Brian G. LloydParr Brown Gee & Loveless | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 2.46 | 4.86 | 3.05 |
| RICHARD G. BROWNKIMBALL, PARR, WADDOUPS, BROWN & GEE | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 5.34 | 1.90 |