GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO GT (last ticker on record)
CIK 42582Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dinsmore & ShohlFirst linked May 2025 · Named in a filing · 96 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Gowling WLG (Canada) LLPFirst linked May 2020 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 2.46× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in a filing · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Taft Stettinius & HollisterFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in a filing · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Fasken MartineauFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in a filing · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Feb 2010 · Named in a filing · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Nov 1998 · Named in a filing · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2022 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Steptoe & JohnsonFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinsmore & Shohl | May 2025 | Named in a filing | 96 | 0.64 | 0.24 | 0.64 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP | May 2020 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.67 | 2.46 | 0.99 |
| Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP | Nov 2015 | Named in a filing | 97 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Taft Stettinius & Hollister | Nov 2015 | Named in a filing | 94 | 1.64 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| Fasken Martineau | Feb 2010 | Named in a filing | 126 | 1.03 | 0.37 | 0.87 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Feb 2010 | Named in a filing | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
| Covington & Burling | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.89 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Nov 1998 | Named in a filing | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2022 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Allen & Overy | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 244 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.66 |
| Steptoe & Johnson | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 80 | 1.10 | 0.65 | 1.34 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel T. YoungThompson Hine LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David S. HuntingtonPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Kyle T. SeifriedPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Scott A. BarshayPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in a filing · 57 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- David H. EngvallCovington & BurlingFirst linked May 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
- Carey S. RobertsCovington & BurlingFirst linked May 2007 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Paul T. ShultzFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 136 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Jonathan I. LessnerMorris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- John W. WhiteCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Nov 1998 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel T. YoungThompson Hine LLP | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David S. HuntingtonPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Kyle T. SeifriedPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2021 | Named in a filing | 17 | 2.90 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Scott A. BarshayPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2021 | Named in a filing | 57 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| David H. EngvallCovington & Burling | May 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 1.60 |
| Carey S. RobertsCovington & Burling | May 2007 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Paul T. Shultz | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 136 | 1.34 | 0.18 | 1.49 |
| Jonathan I. LessnerMorris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.67 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| John W. WhiteCravath Swaine & Moore | Nov 1998 | Named in a filing | 32 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 0.66 |