GOODRICH CORP GR (last ticker on record)
CIK 42542Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jones DayFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSONFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 1997 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jun 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jun 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jones Day | Oct 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 58 | 1.13 | 0.57 | 1.27 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 1997 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jun 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| White & Case | Jun 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James P. DoughertyDavis PolkFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- David W. DabbsROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSONFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 5.34× · 95% wipeout 1.90×
- STEPHEN M. LYNCHROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSONFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Maureen BrundageWhite & CaseFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- ELLIOTT V. STEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 1997 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James P. DoughertyDavis Polk | Oct 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| David W. DabbsROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON | Oct 2008 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 5.34 | 1.90 |
| STEPHEN M. LYNCHROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Maureen BrundageWhite & Case | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| ELLIOTT V. STEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 1997 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 |