Ally Financial Inc. ALLY (last ticker on record)
CIK 40729Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Nov 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 16
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Holland & HartFirst linked Dec 2020 · Named in a filing · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Nov 2019 · Named in a filing · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in a filing · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Mar 2010 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Jan 2009 · Named in a filing · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holland & Hart | Dec 2020 | Named in a filing | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Nov 2019 | Named in a filing | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Allen & Overy | Apr 2011 | Named in a filing | 244 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.66 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Mar 2010 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2009 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Mayer Brown | Jan 2009 | Named in a filing | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Davis Polk | Jun 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Ropes & Gray | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.96 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Catherine M. ClarkinSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in a filing · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Marc TrevinoSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Amy BowlerHolland & HartFirst linked Dec 2020 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Brett CooperOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Nov 2019 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 2.34× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- John B. MeadeDavis PolkFirst linked Dec 2017 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- C. Andrew GerlachSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Jay ClaytonSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- James J. ClarkCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Noah B. NewitzCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Richard J. SandlerDavis PolkFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Richard A. DruckerDavis PolkFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.89× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Benjamin M. RothWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- David E. ShapiroWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- John C. KennedyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- John M. BrandowWilliams MullenFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Peter E. DevlinDavis PolkFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine M. ClarkinSullivan & Cromwell | Oct 2022 | Named in a filing | 52 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Marc TrevinoSullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2021 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Amy BowlerHolland & Hart | Dec 2020 | Named in a filing | 31 | 0.77 | 1.30 | 0.88 |
| Brett CooperOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Nov 2019 | Named in a filing | 32 | 0.84 | 2.34 | 0.81 |
| John B. MeadeDavis Polk | Dec 2017 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| C. Andrew GerlachSullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Jay ClaytonSullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 2.43 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| James J. ClarkCahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Noah B. NewitzCahill Gordon & Reindel | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| Richard J. SandlerDavis Polk | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Richard A. DruckerDavis Polk | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.16 | 0.89 | 0.53 |
| Benjamin M. RothWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2009 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| David E. ShapiroWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2009 | Named in a filing | 56 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| John C. KennedyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 88 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| John M. BrandowWilliams Mullen | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 10 | 2.63 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| Peter E. DevlinDavis Polk | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 14 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.68 |