GENERAL MILLS INC GIS (last ticker on record)
CIK 40704Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began May 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in a filing · 138 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 4.29× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in a filing · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 1996 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2021 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Mar 2023 | Named in a filing | 138 | 1.29 | 4.29 | 1.16 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Mar 2018 | Named in a filing | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Oct 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Feb 1996 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2021 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Davis Polk | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brandon C. MasonFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Brian R. RosenauDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.84×
- Sung K. KangCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Gary L. TygessonDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 2.76× · 95% wipeout 1.85×
- Jonathan B. AbramDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 1.22× · 95% wipeout 2.43×
- Steven A. RosenblumWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
- Robert E. BuckholzSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 1996 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon C. MasonFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Mar 2023 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Brian R. RosenauDorsey & Whitney LLP | Nov 2021 | Named in a filing | 5 | 4.93 | 0.00 | 3.84 |
| Sung K. KangCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Mar 2018 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| Gary L. TygessonDorsey & Whitney LLP | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.24 | 2.76 | 1.85 |
| Jonathan B. AbramDorsey & Whitney LLP | Jan 2003 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.42 | 1.22 | 2.43 |
| Steven A. RosenblumWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 55 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| Robert E. BuckholzSullivan & Cromwell | Feb 1996 | Named in a filing | 39 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 0.93 |