GATEWAY ENERGY CORP/NE GNRG (last ticker on record)
CIK 40194Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Apr 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Porter & HedgesFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Stinson Morrison HeckerFirst linked May 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Cline Williams Wright Johnson & OldfatherFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Davis Graham & StubbsFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 142 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porter & Hedges | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 108 | 1.13 | 0.36 | 1.44 |
| Stinson Morrison Hecker | May 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 93 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Cline Williams Wright Johnson & Oldfather | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Davis Graham & Stubbs | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 142 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.46 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Craig L. EvansStinson Morrison Hecker | May 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 1.72 |