FULLER H B CO FUL (last ticker on record)
CIK 39368Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked Oct 2020 · Named in a filing · 138 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 4.29× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Faegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in a filing · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Oct 2020 | Named in a filing | 138 | 1.29 | 4.29 | 1.16 |
| Faegre Baker Daniels | Feb 2017 | Named in a filing | 145 | 1.06 | 0.34 | 1.16 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brandon C. MasonFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- W. Morgan BurnsFaegre & BensonFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Paul T. ShultzFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 136 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Jay L. SwansonDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon C. MasonFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Feb 2017 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| W. Morgan BurnsFaegre & Benson | Feb 2017 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Paul T. Shultz | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 136 | 1.34 | 0.18 | 1.49 |
| Jay L. SwansonDorsey & Whitney LLP | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 |