FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS INDUSTRIES INC FFEX (last ticker on record)
CIK 39273Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Strasburger & PriceFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Locke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked May 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strasburger & Price | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 39 | 0.87 | 1.01 | 1.23 |
| Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 106 | 1.24 | 0.72 | 1.73 |
| Baker & McKenzie | May 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Roger W. BivansBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- Kent JamisonLocke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.31×
- Alan G. HarveyBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger W. BivansBaker & McKenzie | Nov 2008 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.65 | 1.43 | 1.58 |
| Kent JamisonLocke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 2.31 |
| Alan G. HarveyBaker & McKenzie | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.51 | 1.01 | 1.35 |