CULLEN/FROST BANKERS, INC. CFR (last ticker on record)
CIK 39263Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Baker BottsFirst linked Mar 1997 · Named in a filing · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Mar 1997 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 1997 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Baker Botts | Mar 1997 | Named in a filing | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 0.98 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Mar 1997 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Mar 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Catherine M. ClarkinSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in a filing · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 148 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
- Mark J. MentingSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 1997 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine M. ClarkinSullivan & Cromwell | Jan 2013 | Named in a filing | 52 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 148 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.42 |
| Mark J. MentingSullivan & Cromwell | Mar 1997 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.51 | 0.00 | 0.00 |