FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO LLC
CIK 38009Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jun 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.84 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Louis G. HeringMorris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Alan D. SchnitzerSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Lisa L. JacobsShearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louis G. HeringMorris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Alan D. SchnitzerSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 8 | 3.48 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Lisa L. JacobsShearman & Sterling | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 0.97 |