FORD MOTOR CO F (last ticker on record)
CIK 37996Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in a filing · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked May 2008 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Oct 1995 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNELFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Feb 2023 | Named in a filing | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Hogan & Hartson | May 2008 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2006 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Oct 1995 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.89 |
| MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNEL | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 17 | 3.17 | 0.00 | 0.48 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew L. FabensGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in a filing · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Robert D. GiannattasioGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Michael KaplanDavis PolkFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in a filing · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- J. Warren Gorrell Jr.Hogan & HartsonFirst linked May 2008 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Joseph G. Connolly Jr.Hogan & HartsonFirst linked May 2008 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Alan D. SchnitzerSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Paul T. ShultzFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 136 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Lisa L. JacobsShearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Lou R. KlingSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.33×
- ANDREW R. BROWNSTEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- George R. Bason Jr.Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew L. FabensGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Feb 2023 | Named in a filing | 85 | 1.47 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Robert D. GiannattasioGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Feb 2023 | Named in a filing | 5 | 3.57 | 0.00 | 1.53 |
| Michael KaplanDavis Polk | Mar 2009 | Named in a filing | 112 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| J. Warren Gorrell Jr.Hogan & Hartson | May 2008 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Joseph G. Connolly Jr.Hogan & Hartson | May 2008 | Named in a filing | 28 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 1.89 |
| Alan D. SchnitzerSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2006 | Named in a filing | 8 | 3.48 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Paul T. Shultz | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 136 | 1.34 | 0.18 | 1.49 |
| Lisa L. JacobsShearman & Sterling | Dec 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Lou R. KlingSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 32 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 0.33 |
| ANDREW R. BROWNSTEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 117 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| George R. Bason Jr.Davis Polk | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 37 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.58 |