DELHAIZE AMERICA LLC DZA (last ticker on record)
CIK 37912Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2001
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Dec 2000 to Dec 2008
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSONFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Akin GumpFirst linked May 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Jan 2011 · Text search only · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Linklaters LLPFirst linked Jan 2011 · Text search only · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2011 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Verrill DanaFirst linked Jan 2011 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 58 | 1.13 | 0.57 | 1.27 |
| Akin Gump | May 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Hunton & Williams | Jan 2011 | Text search only | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Linklaters LLP | Jan 2011 | Text search only | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2011 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Verrill Dana | Jan 2011 | Text search only | 24 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David W. DabbsROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSONFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 5.34× · 95% wipeout 1.90×
- Stephen E. OlderMcGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.92× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- J. Steven PattersonHunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David W. DabbsROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 5.34 | 1.90 |
| Stephen E. OlderMcGuireWoods LLP | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 35 | 2.92 | 0.66 | 1.79 |
| J. Steven PattersonHunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.52 |