FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO
CIK 37634Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Jan 2009 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLPFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 1.63× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Morris JamesFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Thelen Reid & PriestFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Reid & Priest LLPFirst linked May 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Steel Hector & DavisFirst linked May 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- THOMAS R. MCGUIGANFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Lewis | Mar 2009 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Jan 2009 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP | Apr 2007 | Named in a filing | 54 | 0.75 | 1.63 | 1.56 |
| Sidley Austin | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
| Morris James | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 95 | 1.62 | 0.42 | 0.86 |
| Thelen Reid & Priest | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 124 | 0.98 | 1.16 | 1.20 |
| Reid & Priest LLP | May 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 1.38 | 0.67 | 0.91 |
| Steel Hector & Davis | May 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 1.36 | 0.58 | 1.17 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Hunton & Williams | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| THOMAS R. MCGUIGAN | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 5 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eric TashmanSidley AustinFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Richard L. HardenHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eric TashmanSidley Austin | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Richard L. HardenHunton & Williams | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 10 | 2.91 | 0.00 | 0.00 |